Response to Better Together’s latest PR video produced by an ordinary supporter

Better Together have started to publish videos from ordinary people in Scotland explaining why they intend to vote “No” in the referendum.  The first one of the series that they announced today is here:

I think this lady is very brave to go public with her views and they should not be dismissed lightly.  What she is saying is that she worries that independence will put at risk the access to free education and healthcare that she benefited from.  She fears that her younger brother and sister might not have the same access in an independent Scotland that she did.    

She has a different perspective to many because her family is from abroad and has benefited from access to public services which (I am assuming) they didn’t have in their country of origin.  So the contrast with a severe lack of access to healthcare and education is based on very real and personal experience.

I’ve laid into English celebrities on this blog for supporting “no” based on pure emotion and no analysis of the issues.  I guess I find it disappointing that Better Together is sponsoring a broadcast from an ordinary Scot which also has no analysis of the issues.  

It’s a good technique to start off discussing an issue by expressing fears, feelings, and impressions.  It’s also good to conclude by expressing opinions.  But between those two steps, there must be some kind of analysis to explain how you have formed your opinions.  Not doing so fails to convince the serious reader.  Or it convinces readers on the basis of emotion rather than reason.  This is at best, due to ignorance and at worst, manipulation. 

In this case, some consideration of the positions of both sides on healthcare and education would have been in order.  On healthcare, the Better Together website suggests that an independent Scotland will lose out on about an extra £1bn per year of UK government funding and current cross-border arrangements for some specialist care and medical research may be put at risk. 

On higher education, the Better Together website suggests that leaving the UK puts at risk free tuition for Scottish students and a disproportionate share of UK funding for research. 

But no-one in the official “No” campaign has suggested that independence could lead to third world levels of provision of healthcare and education.    Their estimated “union dividend” of £1,400 per person per year would not in any case be consistent with this.  This video is vaguely suggesting extreme scenarios for healthcare and education which are not in line with Better Together’s own predictions.

Anyone can upload a video on YouTube with their own opinions, normally with little circulation.  When it goes viral, this puts the broadcaster in the public eye and makes them vulnerable to criticism on a scale they need to be ready for.   And so, I have an accusation to make against the Better Together campaign:

You have sponsored a broadcast from one of your ordinary supporters for your own PR purposes and which will consequently be seen by a much wider audience than otherwise.   This video lacks any analysis of the issues. You could have informed her of your own campaign material, and coached her on how to make a reasoned contribution to the debate.  You could have added commentary to refer viewers to the relevant material.   I am sure you have people with the ability to do that.  If you didn’t have the time, you should have waited until you did or not bothered at all.

I hope your subsequent broadcasts improve upon this one, if only for the sake of the ordinary people who are putting their reputations on the line to help you.  In the meantime, please delete this video from your website.  If you do, I’ll pull this blog article so that we can all forget about it.   


7 thoughts on “Response to Better Together’s latest PR video produced by an ordinary supporter

  1. Its a pity that she does not yet seem to have grasped the concept that her voting ‘No’ will be what actually helps to destroy the remaining NHS in Scotland and will also lead to the re-introduction of tuition fees in Scotland.

    Do not take my word for it – please listen to Dr Philippa Whitford’s comments on this issue.

    If the current Lib/Dems who form part of the current Westminster Government were unable to keep their pledge of keeping no tuition fees in England when they are IN POWER then what chance is there of retaining free education in Scotland in a post No referendum vote – this is what I fail to understand about her standpoint. She actually highlights very good reasons for voting Yes not the other way around.

    As I said she has actually made a case for a yes vote not a No vote.

  2. To be honest U.E.H. this ‘level of communication’ (or rather ‘lack of accurate communication’ – depending on personal opinion) from the unionist BT campaign just about sums up the pathetic standard and tactics so far seen across the board of trying to cause as much ‘smoke’ on as ‘many issues’ as possible, whilst addressing absolutely NONE themselves – in my own opinion of course.

    Not hard at all for anyone to take two minutes out to easily debunk the vast majority of propaganda B.S. that has been endlessly spouting from the BT/NT/UKOK/NoBorders campaign or whatever they are called this week.

    Trouble is that the UK mainstream media outlets seem to have completely forgotten how to be impartial journalists that actual check and verify their stories before peddling the inaccuracies and blatant and outright lies as fact.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s